Archive for February, 2005

More Long Tail

February 27th, 2005

David continues the discussion … in response to my notion that even if nobody reads me, I succeed …

The problem I see is that a major benefit of blogging is the opportunity to get diverse feedback for your thoughts and diverse access to the thoughts of others. If, in fact, you are the only one blogging there is no benefit beyond writing out your thoughts in a file on your own computer.

And Rovy provides his operationalized definition of the Long Tail

In other words, the critical mass is the entire population in the curve, including those on the high-end (most popular blogs) and those trailing out near the end of the tail (with few readers, like me).

Read the rest of this entry »


Critical Mass and the Long Tail

February 24th, 2005

Welcome David Miller (from Emerging Perceptions) to the on-going conversation between Rovy and I.

The notion of critical mass and the long tail seems somehow disconnected. The nature of the long tail is the sparse connection. How can there be critical mass in the long tail? The long tail does not require any “cricital mass” … in fact if it GETS a critical mass, it ceases to be the long tail and becomes, instead, the Big Spike.

Vance Durrington put this comment on one of my posts “at this point if I were try to use blogs as an example of my research, it would get about as much attention as if I was the first and only person to own a fax machine. Great toy, who are you faxing to? Great blog, who


The Question of When

February 23rd, 2005

The discussion that Rovy and I were having centered around this notion of time. We will always have more to do than we have day to do it in. With that backdrop, perhaps I should be trying to answer the question “When?” — not “Why?”

When will you find the time to blog? Setting up a blog is a 5 minute exercise, but actually WRITING in the blog is a matter of, perhaps, an hour a week. What can you give up?

When will you find the time to read? Many of you have difficulty in dealing with as few as 100 email messages a day. What will you have to give up to spend 20 minutes fiddling with an aggregator? And — worse — how can you possibly find the time it takes to read 5 or 10 thought provoking posts on blogs in a day?

The HOW question is merely one of technology — RSS aggregators and simple interfaces solve the reading and writing connection issues. The issue of WHEN revolves around opportunity cost. What do I have to forego if I do this other thing? These are difficult questions and go back to the notion of identity.

Who am I?

What does the answer to THAT question mean when I operationalize it? If I am who I think I am, what does that mean I am obligated to do. The reality of identity is that it’s not a label, it’s all the things that come together to make me who I am. My name is focuses and identifies me, but only serves as the container for my skills, talents, attitudes, biases, and ideas. My place in the world is defined by how I interact with the world and, for that, I need action. I am, ultimately, what I do.

For me, the answers are neither cut nor dried. They are not static but are modified by the conditions I find about me. Each day I learn more about who I am because each day I find new things to relate and react to. Some characteristics are less mutable (I hope) than others. Some characteristics are being refined and re-defined every day.

For example.

I am a professional in the field of educational technology. What I do is deal with the issues, tools, techniques, and application of same as relate to a field that is different today than it was yesterday. I haven’t figured out HOW it is different today yet, but I know that overnight, somehow and perhaps subtly, it changed. One of my primary duties is to attempt to discover where and how so I can begin to formulate a response to that change. I do not expect to succeed, but in the effort I may discover what I failed to learn yesterday, or the day before, or the day before that. My definition of “professional” does not extend to actually discovering where and how the world changed overnight — only that I make the attempt to do so every day.

Yes, I have other — more urgent tasks. I have a sick kid that needs care. I have a presentation to give in about an hour. I have bills that need paying and obligations to my employer. Being a professional in the field of educational technology is, perhaps, not the most important of the various characteristics that define me. But the nature of identity is that one can’t really rank the components of identity. It is part of the recipe that is me. Removing one component means I’m not the same husband, or father, or employee, or teacher that I am with it. What I do in each of those areas is governed by my perceptions of the other — the eternal balancing act we face as humans. And perhaps how we balance — the choices we make when between the rock and hardplace — defines identity more than anything.

So, when do *I* do this stuff?

I do it early in the morning and late at night. I sleep very little. My wife complains that I’m never in bed when she is and my kids think I’m a lil wierd. My lawn is always shaggy (or scalped) and my car is filthy. My colleagues here at work know that I’m obsessed and I drive my staff crazy with all the strange notions that I expose them to. I work on things during the day that help me deal with my identity as a professional. I try to keep up with the urgent tasks while not letting them totally block out the important ones. I work at my life about 15-18 hours a day seven days a week. My job only takes up about half of that.

The point is that I had to answer the question of when my own way — in keeping with my identity as a professional. Failing to participate in the community cuts to the core of that identity and cannot be allowed.

So who are you? And when do you do it?


What’s wrong with this picture?

February 22nd, 2005

Last weekend, there was a bloggers conference at UBC in Vancouver. Take a look at these two links and tell me what’s wrong.

Northern Voice site

New PR Wiki page

Don’t know?

Go google “aect chicago” … see it yet?


YES!

February 21st, 2005

Jim Ellsworth blogs!

For those who thought I was incapable of making a short post.


How Many Is Enough?

February 21st, 2005

The dialog continues … Rovy brings up the issue of publication. I talked about that in some length in another post, The Publication Pothole so I won’t go into too much here other than to recapitulate a couple of the main points.
Read the rest of this entry »


Academic Perspective

February 20th, 2005

If more people were writing, I wouldn’t pick on Rovy so much

In academia, are blogs a replacement for traditional publishing? An addendum? Do they merely fill the space between private communication (e.g. email) and public research dissemination? Is the critical mass in academia in place to self-regulate?

Read the rest of this entry »


Bridging the Divide (a continuing conversation)

February 18th, 2005

Sam Adams it is :D
Rovy said:

News aggregators … and blogs are still not as easy to use as they should be. Not that one or the other by itself is complex but, the combination is still somewhat confusing … For those of us who have multiple RSS feeds on our blogs and use Flickr, Feedburner, and a myriad of other gadgets, a simple blog and aggregator seems like an easy combination. But, I think we have become experts without realizing it … So, one issue is the relative immaturity of the technology.

Read the rest of this entry »


Some Definitions and a Rationale

February 17th, 2005

Rovy Branon over on Situativity has asked some questions that are very reasonable. I’m glad somebody is finally asking them [Obligatory disclosure: I did NOT pay Rovy to ask those questions, but I'm tickled to death that he did and I'll buy him One Beverage of Choice in Orlando in thanks.]
Read the rest of this entry »


Building Bridges

February 16th, 2005

Yesterday I wrote a piece on AECT being on the wrong side of the Digital Divide. You can read it over on Terra Incognita. Last night I got an email from one of my most cherished colleagues who said, “I think I’ve become (sadly) a perfect example of the case you’re making and I have the desire, but not the time to figure it all out.”
Read the rest of this entry »